Talk:Andrew Gonzalez

GA status

 * 1. Well written? Pass
 * 2. Factually accurate? Pass
 * 3. Broad in coverage? Pass
 * 4. Neutral point of view? Pass
 * 5. Article stability? Pass
 * 6. Images? Pass

So it is a good article overall. If it is possible, a general expansion of this article would be needed, if not, then it clearly touches all aspects needed for the GA class at this moment. Lincher 01:10, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you. -- Mithril Cloud 06:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

GA Re-Review and In-line citations
Members of the WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. LuciferMorgan 03:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

GA reassessment
After reading through this article, I am going to have to fail a reassessment. There is only one active source used in the article (the second one is a deadlink), and I'm not even sure if that one is reliable or not. The article needs reliable, third-party sources (there's several here) in order to be a GA. If this can be fixed, it can be renominated at GAN. Wizardman 22:52, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Andrew Gonzalez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060518043832/http://www.mb.com.ph/issues/2006/02/01/OPED2006020155180.html to http://www.mb.com.ph/issues/2006/02/01/OPED2006020155180.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060808053730/http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/ to http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:02, 5 July 2017 (UTC)