Talk:Andrew Hudson (cricketer)

Edit war - citations needed 1 November 2013
(Text below copied over for other wiki users' attention) Aliwal2012 (talk) 19:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew Hudson, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ''Per wp:burden, the sentences here need inline RS refs. You have now twice removed the templates, without addressing that problem, even though it has been pointed out to you.'' Epeefleche (talk) 18:49, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Instead of drawing my attention to your dilemma, in the first place, on a talk page, YOU JUST REVERT boots and all! You should be blocked from reverting constructive contributions, have a peaceful weekend! Aliwal2012 (talk) 18:58, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm happy for you to add properly RS-referenced material. Please don't add such material if it is not RS-referenced.  And please do not delete maintenance templates without addressing the problem first.  In the above, that means providing proper RS inline refs.  Thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:07, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, u are now getting very technical on a Friday night! I don't understand, RS=Reputable Source? The citation given below the infobox of Andrew Hudson is [|ESPN Cricinfo]? What more is needed my friend? Aliwal2012 (talk) 19:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I will leave word on your talkpage. It refers to a reliable source.  Simply add such a ref after every sentence, in inline citation form (or each entry in the infobox that it applies to).--Epeefleche (talk) 23:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Source material
--Dweller (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)