Talk:Andrew Lewin

Neutrality
I wonder, , , , if "defected to the Labour Party" should be changed to something like "left the Liberal Democrats for the Labour Party". Mcljlm (talk) 20:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Sounds reasonable. I'll support whatever consensus is reached. --ThingsCanOnlyGetWetter (talk) 21:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * As the person who wrote that sentence, I'll explain that I chose that word because it was the language used in the article cited. When I wrote it, I had no intention of comprimising the neutrality of the article. However, I do understand your perspective and will support the consensus reached in this discussion. CybJubal (talk) 22:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I realised you were using the cited article's word but neutral language doesn't necessarily appear in newspapers. Mcljlm (talk) 03:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
 * That's a fair comment. Once again: I'll support the consesus reached here. CybJubal (talk) 00:44, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Would also support the consensus but I think the suggestion is sensible THeShavidow1 (talk) 07:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I concur, it does help that we have a reason for their leaving. No Swan So Fine (talk) 09:30, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Is there a better phrase than what I suggested? Mcljlm (talk) 03:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)