Talk:Anemospilia

Lack of references

 * No references or citation used. extremely unconvincing, i have never heard of the "western chamber" and "conclusion" section before.

Done --5telios 07:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * museum(s) with artefacts?

Conclusion
The debate about whether or not this is evidence for human sacrifice is still very much open - so the conclusion section saying that it most likely is, seems entirely superfluous. Especially as the idea has been aired before in the introduction and further on in the text. The idea that they went up there as a result of the recent earthquakes and that a younger man would be more pleasing - though suggested in some popular history - is complete conjecture. There is no evidence for that at all. I take it upon myself to remove the "conclusion" part - if someone has a problem with that, just restore it and put a note here why you think it should be there. --131.111.233.196 (talk) 14:31, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Writing
This article reads very poorly and really needs to be cleaned up. No offense, but it was either written by someone to whom English is a second language or by someone who just doesn't have very good writing skills. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.229.137.173 (talk) 05:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Coordinate error
The Wikipedia coordinates for Anemospilia are wrong. The correct coordinates are: Latitude: 35.255517° Longitude: 25.144569° The temple is clearly visible in Google-Earth!

(RWFG)

—96.251.17.134 (talk) 05:43, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅. Thanks for pointing out the problem. Deor (talk) 13:43, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Unreliable sources
This article is entirely based on a self-published web page (and its author has none of the academic credentials required for this kind of work).--Dipa1965 (talk) 13:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC)