Talk:Anenome

I agree with Whouk, in an ideal world the redirect would just go to the correct spelling. In this case, however, I felt a little more comment and clarification was required. This usage is such a common mistake – misapprehension, even – yet I don't think it warrants mentioning on all of the relevant pages. I note that on Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) the final section reads (and I quote):
 * ==Break rules==
 * For every style suggestion above, there's some page which has a good reason to do something else. These guidelines are intended for consistency, but usefulness to the reader is the principal goal. So ignore these guidelines if you have a good reason.

I felt I had a good reason... SiGarb 16:18, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


 * There isn't an existing disambiguation page for Anemone. If you think we need one, create one and point the Anenome redirect to that. On that page, you could then briefly mention the possible misspelling, although I still think the redirect itself handles it. --Whouk (talk) 16:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I've created the disambiguation page and moved the content from here. I think that solves the problem. Someone looking for anenome wil lend up at the disambig page, with the notes about the spelling; someone looking for 'anemone' will get to the flower, which has a disambig note about the snimal and the disambig page. The Land 17:35, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that. --Whouk (talk) 20:18, 16 January 2006 (UTC)