Talk:Angel (Lady and the Tramp II)

Merge/Delete
I don't see why there should be a separate article for Angel, seeing as there's very little information on her and seeing as she's not that notable a character. There's no need to reiterate the plot, as it's already discussed in the Lady and the Tramp II article, and the "personality" section seems to be more original research than anything else. If there IS any important information about her in this article, it should just be merged with the existing Lady and the Tramp II article, and if there ISN'T any, it would be better to have this article deleted. --SilentAria talk 13:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

I don't see why there shouldn't be a separate article for her. Seems legitimate to me. Is the Internet running out of space? - OmarSnake —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.183.16.137 (talk) 02:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * You might want to take a look at WP:NOTE and WP:VERIFY before you say that it's "legitimate". This article does not affirm the character's notability, nor does it contain any sources that verify the various claims listed in the Personality section. I'll be nominating this article for deletion soon if no one provides secondary sources that prove this character's notability. --SilentAria talk 11:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)