Talk:Angel Sanctuary/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Morgan695 (talk · contribs) 02:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be taking this up. Full comments to follow. Morgan695 (talk) 02:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Basic GA criteria

 * 1) Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
 * 2) Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
 * 3) Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
 * 4) Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
 * 5) Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
 * 6) Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction
 * 7) Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
 * 8) Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations – not applicable.
 * 9) All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
 * 10) All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
 * 11) Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
 * 12) No original research.
 * 13) No copyright violations or plagiarism.
 * 14) Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
 * 15) Neutral.
 * 16) Stable.
 * 17) Illustrated, if possible.
 * 18) Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.


 * Earwigs pinged copyvio because a Goodreads review copy+pasted the plot summary wholesale, but the article copy precedes the review, so no worries there.
 * inspired by the book Nocturne needs context for what Nocturne is
 * To search for Sara's soul, sent to Hell for incest, Setsuna's body enters a near-death state, and his soul searches for hers, eventually learning that it has been taken to Heaven instead break into two sentences
 * In the second paragraph under "Audio drama", the continued use of "appeared" seems like a strange word choice

Overall, this is a very well written article that requires only a few changes. The over-reliance on primary sources is somewhat concerning, but acceptable by GA standards. Once you've made the changes above, I'll pass the article. Morgan695 (talk) 21:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Also think the article and its subpages would benefit from a navbox, but because I didn't mention it in my initial review I decided to be bold and add it myself. Morgan695 (talk) 16:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi and thank you for taking the time to review! It's so very appreciated. Re: the Goodreads review, that is so very embarrassing! I hope it wasn't a big thing. I have made the changes, with the exception of the context for Nocturne, which I don't have, regrettably. The interview only discusses the book title and a brief plot summary, so that's all the context I have. Thank you for adding the navbox; I was not aware of it! Best wishes, Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 19:56, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * For Nocturne I think it literally just needs 2-4 words of context, like the Japanese fantasy novel Nocturne (if it is indeed Japanese and a fantasy novel, just using this as an example) or the novel Nocturne by [author], or something similar. Morgan695 (talk) 20:05, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Of course! I've added it now. Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 20:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Passed for GA. Morgan695 (talk) 20:22, 7 May 2020 (UTC)