Talk:Angela Wright

Research
More work is needed to document people who run third-sector outfits than pop-stars and footballers, or even academics and poets. They are focussed, like business people, on results not on getting seen or published. This maybe is one of the reasons our coverage is relatively poor in the areas of executives in most sectors. Rich Farmbrough, 01:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC).

Restoring reference
If a reference is a dead link, you should not remove it until and unless you have something better to replace it with.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC).

The reference did not support the claim it was supposed to reference. To be a valid source or reference it would need to state Angela Wright won an award. Nowhere on the page referenced is this suggested. isfutile:P (talk) 21:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion
This page should be deleted for non-notability, and verifiability concerns due to the lack of reliable sources. In addition, some of the edits may be WP:COI as they appear to have been written by an editor whose is the subject of the article.

I was going through the procedures at Articles for deletion and trying to find reliable sources, and the only thing I came up with was an insolvency liquidation proceeding in a royally sanctioned legal newspaper. I duly added that to the article, but I still don't find that the head of a now-defunct company with little prior note in MSM or elsewhere deserves a bio article on Wikipedia. Mathglot (talk) 07:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The Afd nomination was closed as No consensus. Mathglot (talk) 05:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)