Talk:Angelic Yields

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Jimmyy68 (talk) 21:22, 21 September 2021 (UTC) I do not see any reason why this article should be deleted. This article talks about a recent popular counter-trend of a now banned trend. The counter-trend has been talked about heavily in the last hour or so.
 * I agree that this page should not be deleted. However, I also don't think it warrants a separate article, as most sources I've found talk about it in conjunction with the Devious Licks trend. I've redirected it to Devious Licks; since the trends are related, relevant info about the Angelic Yields trend can be added there. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 21:26, 21 September 2021 (UTC)