Talk:Angelini

Sources?
The company website is not considered a reliable source, which means that except for the paragraph about the Central Nervous System there is not a single valid source in the whole article. Also, wordings like "The turning point" or "The golden age" and the advertising style throughout the article may be fine for a company website but certainly not for an encyclopedia. I'll be happy to tackle that as soon as I get around to it, but I certainly won't mind if someone gets ahead of me there. --84.190.90.147 (talk) 18:37, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Use of sources
"The area of drugs active on the CNS, particularly drugs for mood disorders, is the field where Angelini has enjoyed the greatest successes and recognition at world level." So are you seriously claiming that the source - an article published in the US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health - says that "Angelini has enjoyed the greatest successes and recognition at world level"? Sorry, I know we are supposed to assume WP:AGF here, but I find it hard to imagine that a scientific article would seriously say that kind of thing. It would be nice if someone who has access to the full article (I can see only the abstract) could verify this claim. --84.190.90.147 (talk) 19:10, 25 October 2016 (UTC)