Talk:Anglo-Powhatan Wars

Why stub class?
This article is not a stub, I put in a lot of work to make it as comprehensive as possible. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 23:30, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Indeed, to me it looks like a C class at least, and I have provisionally assessed it as such. I'd suggest posting a request for assessment at WP:MHA. GregorB (talk) 09:53, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Not enough sources
There's all kinds of dates and even quotes that aren't sourced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.208.40.196 (talk) 07:17, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anglo-Powhatan Wars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101120054158/http://www.baylink.org/treaty/ to http://www.baylink.org/treaty/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:12, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Verification needed
This was previously "under West's command".

They therefore returned to the fort under De La Warr's command.

De La Warr's article refers to him as "De La Warr" and places him in command circa 1610, but I'm only 95% confident that he's in command rather than his brother at this precise juncture.

Some citations would also help. &mdash; MaxEnt 22:18, 7 November 2021 (UTC)


 * I noticed a few more "West"s, now changed to De La Warr. People don't read Wikipedia with the same thoroughness as other historical accounts, and we really shouldn't count on people not to confuse Francis and Thomas across scattered references. De La Warr is a simple solution, but so is using Thomas West in full in each instance. I have no great preference myself &mdash; MaxEnt 22:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)