Talk:Aniara (film)

The third reference is very poor...
After reviewing the film for the forth time, and reading the translation of the poem, It is clear that the third reference, includes many ( more than 10) more bits of background information from the poem that is not in the movie. Its more of a "I read the poem, and you didn't. Its stunning that The journal Nature did not flag it.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02581-w — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.115.119.75 (talk) 03:35, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I need to ask you to be specific. That is, please list some or all of those bits of background information. (It is possible the writer, Elizabeth Gibney, is using them in a comparison to the poem, rather than claiming they're part of the movie, which then is quite okay.) CapnZapp (talk) 07:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

the movie has topics that didn't exist in the original poem
it's obviously up to the producer to make the main hero woman while he was originally man and furthermore to make her have a lesbian relationship, but i think it would be fair to mention somewhere in the article that it wasn't not intention of the poet

p.s. personally i think it's a pity the movie omitted daisy doode who was the most optimistic character there, overall that adaptation isn't very true to the original source... 109.252.132.115 (talk) 19:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC)