Talk:Anita Garibaldi

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Anita Garibaldi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090621012508/http://legis.senado.gov.br:80/pls/prodasen/PRODASEN.LAYOUT_MATE_DETALHE.SHOW_INTEGRAL?t=9977 to http://legis.senado.gov.br/pls/prodasen/PRODASEN.LAYOUT_MATE_DETALHE.SHOW_INTEGRAL?t=9977
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070225112844/http://politicalscience.cos.ucf.edu:80/secolas/TLA/issues/ws2002/review_valerio.php to http://politicalscience.cos.ucf.edu/secolas/TLA/issues/ws2002/review_valerio.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Gianicolo statue
Without sources it's hard to distinguish urban legends from fact. For one, a statue dedicated to Anita had been discussed for many years and a plot of land was assigned to it by the national government in April 1928, while the article makes it sound as if it was commissioned by Mussolini in 1929 to spite the Vatican. Second, the fact that the request of the Vatican is mentioned to be "unofficial" sounds like a recipe for unsourced claims, similar to other ones that I've seen over the Garibaldi monument (e.g., that it would've been moved from facing the Vatican after the Lateran Treaty of 1929, or that the Anita monument would've been built to give the impression that Garibaldi was facing her rather than the Vatican, or that it would have been an olive branch to anti-clerical elements within the government who were upset about the Lateran Treaty, etc.). Daydreamers (talk) 21:09, 6 October 2022 (UTC)