Talk:Anjana River/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Aintabli (talk · contribs) 21:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

This article is promising, but there are problems that would better be solved outside a GA review. Links to some sources are dead, such as this. Some citations are incomplete; for example, one reference just included the link "Google Books". The article is on a geographical subject, yet pretty much most of the sources are from news sites. I would expect some more sources, books or other publications by experts on the subject. The article needs to be expanded, specifically Anjana River and Anjana River are a bit too short. The lead doesn't appear to be a summary of the article but has information not mentioned elsewhere and includes more than half of the references. Ideally, it wouldn't have any references and would only mention some of the key points. Simply, dealing with all of the aforementioned issues, plus copyedits and spotchecks, would constitute more than just a review. This list of good articles on related topics could be useful as a reference for how a GA should ideally be like. (Though, please note some of these articles could be reassessed and may not necessarily exemplify a proper GA.) Aintabli (talk) 21:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)