Talk:Ankle bone shooting

Why would I need consensus to edit a page in what seems to me to be an uncontentious issue? Vizjim (talk) 08:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Among other things, you were removing a substantial amount of sourced information without a suitable justification. That is unacceptable all by itself. The other point is, that while an issue is still discussed, consensus is always needed. --Latebird (talk) 09:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The issue wasn't being discussed prior to my edits, so this is nonsense. As I said on the other page, am withdrawing from this discussion. Vizjim (talk) 10:09, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Repeating a reverted edit, unilaterally declaring "consensus not needed" in the edit summary, seems rather disingenuous. The standard procedure calls for bold, revert, discuss instead. And indeed, at that time we were already engaged in a discussion on Talk:Shagai, which you chose to just brush aside. --Latebird (talk) 22:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * ("The other page" seems to be Talk:Shagai, where a merge has been discussed.)--Noe (talk) 16:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)