Talk:Ann Graham

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because it does not match the criteria: three is one extant article and a number of linked redlinks, ie., the page is useful to prevent real confusion. --- üser:Altenmann >t 16:44, 9 August 2015 (UTC) .P.S. In any case, if deleted, the entries must be moved into Graham page. Some of them are not there. - üser:Altenmann >t 16:46, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

, when you nominate a page for deletion, you should inform the creator (in this case, me). Please see MOS:DABRL and MOS:DABMENTION - this contains many valid entries. There is no rule that a dab needs to have pages with their own articles. Boleyn (talk) 19:22, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If there's only one entry notable enough for its own article, though, a DAB isn't necessary. Same for if there's only two notable entries and one of them is the primary topic. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:00, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

No, there are no guidelines that say that a dab should be deleted if it doesn't contain topics notable enough for an article. Boleyn (talk) 20:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)