Talk:Anna Cathcart

Awards and nominations
My understanding about mentioning awards and award nominations: The award should be notable, the award should be notable and highly recognized to mention just a nomination, and the subject (Cathcart in this case) should be named for the award rather than just the production she was in. Lesser awards may be mentioned if there are independent sources that clearly indicate why the award is noteworthy in Cathcart's career. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 03:56, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

, could you respond? --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 15:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

I've removed it again. The win appears the only entry that should be restored. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 16:41, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

And again. --Hipal (talk) 17:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Quick review
The references need a thorough review. I'm seeing what appears to be too much reliance on poor, promotional sources.

I'd trim back instances of "It was announced", "In an interview with", etc.
 * Removed

"Cathcart was established with an agent at the..." doesn't seem encyclopedic. It's verified by an interview?
 * Removed

The name of her sister should be removed as a non-notable person.
 * Removed

Exact dates should be removed in most cases other than for references. --Hipal (talk) 17:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I've removed most of the exact dates

I've resolved most of your comments. As for the sources, I don't think I'll do anything about them until a more thorough review. Pamzeis (talk) 01:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Sorry this article dropped off my radar. I'm not sure when I'll have time to give it much attention. --Hipal (talk) 01:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)