Talk:Annabeth Schott

Dates (Character Age)
The dates given don't seem to make sense. If she was the secretary for a Maryland senator starting in 1970, that would seem to imply that she was born no later than 1952 (assuming she started that job when she was 18). Getting her BA in 1974 would also seem to support this, since most people are 22 when they complete a 4-year degree. Which would mean that the character of Annabeth Schott was supposed to be 52 years old when she first appeared in 2004? Hardly likely! Mid-thirties, at the very most.

Agreed
I agree with this assessment. The cover of Schott's resume appeared in the episode for about one second, so it it reasonable to assume that it was never intended to bear any relation to the casting of Kristen Chenoweth as Annabeth Schott.

Sabos 22:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Taylor Reid?
Annabeth's Resumé seems incorrect as it is clearly mentioned that she was in some way closely involved with the Taylor Reid Show, and this is not borne out by her resumé. Sorry but I think the script speaks louder than this prop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesblythe (talk • contribs) 20:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Annabeth's resume
Could someone tell me from where the information regarding her resume was gleaned? Unless I missed something glaring, this doesn't seem to be based on anything stated on the show. Besides, wasn't it stated in an episode that she was an Art History major (which this information doesn't corroborate.) It also has her graduated college in 1984, which would make her mid-40s which is clearly not the case.

In rewatching the episode it claims to be from, it actually has her graduating college in 1974, which is even more ridiculously false. The resume was just a prop it wasn't meant to be taken seriously. I'm deleting the information. --Harlequin212121 (talk) 10:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Annabethschott6x17.jpg
Image:Annabethschott6x17.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)