Talk:Anne B. Newman

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Claire.l.m. Peer reviewers: TreyDumler, Madison King, Jone033, Danim14.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled
There are many areas that I hope to expand this article. First, I would like to expand on the biography section, adding more about Anne's childhood. I would like to separate the article and add more sections. I would like to have a section devoted to her education. I would like to have another section for her research and published articles. I would like to synthesize my sources and bulk up the information that is given. I also plan to explore the sources that have already been used and make sure the existing information is credible and properly cited. I hope to provide developed and properly cited information. If I can find enough information, I would also like to create a section for her honors and awards. If anyone has any critiques or ideas for me, please let me know on this talk page. I want to make this article the best it can be. Claire.l.m (talk) 21:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review
Claire, I was very impressed to see all the research you have already been able to acquire and summarize into Wikipedia. You did a great job with the biography section, it was very insightful and not overly complex, letting the reader get a general view of what work Newman has accomplished. Your sources are neutral and I did not see that they created any bias in your article! To see the way you outlined your information in chronological order helped me get a better idea of how I will present my information in my article. One suggestion I have would be to create a career section. You could move some of the information presented in the biography section to the career, which gives a little bit more of a clear structure for the article. Overall, I was impressed to see neutral content, reliable sources, and your lead section was very easy to follow. Great job! Madison King (talk) 01:52, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * For the sake of your project and as a learning tool, you should look at the history page. Claire hasn't added anything yet. The article with very few changes, stands as I originally wrote it. Maybe Claire needs help in adding her information? SusunW (talk) 02:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Claire, overall I feel like your article is off to a good start. I like the way you have the biography planned out to where readers can actually understand what you are going to be discussing and that it's not too complicated. You were very straight forward and neutral so to speak. This article will flow very nicely once you get the heading and everything lined out and if you keep the same neutral flow that you have going. Danim14 (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)