Talk:Anne Hutchinson

Women as theological figures page
As Ann Hutchinson appears to be appropriate for the above page, could someone add a brief mention there. Jackiespeel (talk) 21:54, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I've added two women to the list of Protestants: Anne Hutchinson and Mary Dyer.-- Sarnold17 (talk) 23:12, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

The section on Mary Dyer is confusing though,it doesn't fit this topic time-wise (she died 25 years later) or thematically (her dissension had to do with not leaving when asked to leave).

More info,if it were available, on their actual midwifery activities would be of interest, though--are either in the lists of ULK licensees, or noted as present at deliveries or baptisms (or paternity trials) of infants in their lifetime? 71.232.15.49 (talk) 01:52, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Restore editing
I am not willing to have this debate lock down the entire article, so I hereby relinquish my concerns regarding Nedrutland's edits. —Dilidor (talk) 13:14, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Ancestry
Am I the only one who feels that the article goes into unnecessary detail regarding Hutchinson's ancestry? I have before me a biography of Hutchinson by Timothy D. Hall, and it does not mention all these people. I cannot see why the reader should be told that Hutchinson's father's father's mother's father was someone named John Williamson. There is no context for that information, so it seems to contravene WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:NOTGENEALOGY policies. Surtsicna (talk) 12:27, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Champlin (1913)
I've just partially reverted this edit by @Languageseeker. The update of Champlin (1914) to use archive.org instead of Gbooks seems like an improvement. However, Champlin (1913) appears to be a separate publication, and the edit duplicated the link to Champlin (1914); this cannot be correct as the page numbers don't match.

The problem I am having, though, is that as Languageseeker said in their edit summary, the 1913 reference appears to be broken. I have reverted it to

If my reading of JSTOR is correct, The Journal of American History was only published as such from 1964, but succeeded The Mississippi Valley Historical Review, the first volume of which was published in 1914. Volume 5 was published in 1918 and does not contain an article by Champlin about Anne Hutchinson. Hence the reference cannot as such be correct. The Wikipedia page for The Journal of American History suggests the existence of an even earlier predecessor series, Proceedings of the Mississippi Valley Historical Association, but this appears not to be available online. There is a review of the 1913–1914 issue of the Proceedings, published in The Mississippi Valley Historical Review which does not mention the Champlin article. Google books has this rather ghostly entry for a 1911 publication of the same title by Champlin, which doesn't help much either.

So I am at a loss as to what the reference should be. Any ideas? Wham2001 (talk) 17:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


 * After a little more digging through google search results, there is also this catalog entry, which suggests that the original was published in 1911. Wham2001 (talk) 18:25, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Plus there's a 1904 piece in the NYT of the same title, also by Champlin. Everything else in a standard google search appears to be Wikipedia mirror fluff.  Wham2001 (talk) 18:30, 27 March 2022 (UTC)