Talk:Anne Hyde/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 00:51, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

I will get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:51, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Anne's married life was not exactly perfect. Nobody's life is perfect. Combine that sentence with the following one. Rephrase this: Mary of Modena, who offered James his only son, James Francis Edward and explain that he was the only son to survive to adulthood.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Use n-dash between page ranges in cites. Either provide publisher locations (preferred) or not for all books. Need OCLC # for Everett, Lister and Strickland.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * Link Duchies of York and Albany in lede. Who are Edward Hyde and Clarendon? The same person? Also link if appropriate.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * All problems listed above are now solved :) --Alexcoldcasefan (talk) 10:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)