Talk:Anne P. Mitchell

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Anne P. Mitchell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090808013506/http://waysandmeans.house.gov/legacy/humres/107cong/11-15-01/Record/wmwood.htm to http://waysandmeans.house.gov/legacy/humres/107cong/11-15-01/Record/wmwood.htm
 * Added tag to http://www/dushanberelief.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Anne P. Mitchell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326040013/http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/200912/3229?page=2 to http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/200912/3229?page=2
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707004723/http://www.vircom.ch/Can_Laws_Block_Spam.pdf to http://www.vircom.ch/Can_Laws_Block_Spam.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090808013506/http://waysandmeans.house.gov/legacy/humres/107cong/11-15-01/Record/wmwood.htm to http://waysandmeans.house.gov/legacy/humres/107cong/11-15-01/Record/wmwood.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090909091249/http://www.jcil.org/journal/articles/384.html to http://www.jcil.org/journal/articles/384.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Redirect
This page should not be speedily redirect because... (insert redirect here) --KistMarket (talk) 17:05, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Request edit on 27 April 2019
SheDevilEsq (talk) 23:10, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Hello, fellow Wikipedians,

I see that the page discussing me is tagged for speedy deletion. I meet several of the criteria for notability (including "person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field," "scholars (collectively referred to as "academics" for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas", "Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals"), however as I understand the rules, my providing this information is not acceptable. How does one go about proving this (particularly as a) I was the one who received the notice, and b) I am the one who has the best access to all of the relevant information?)

FWIW, there is video of my various testimony in my legislative work, as well as links to all of the episodes of my television show, at annepmitchell.com

Thank you!

Anne

Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law GDPR, CCPA (CA) & CCDPA (CO) Compliance Consultant Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) Legislative Consultant CEO/President, Institute for Social Internet Public Policy Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange Board of Directors, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute Legal Counsel: The Earth Law Center California Bar Association Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee Colorado Cyber Committee Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose Ret. Chair, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop

SheDevilEsq (talk) 23:10, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Reply 27-APR-2019
If you are the one with the best access to these materials, the ideal scenario would have you providing them here on the talk page. The best item to provide is one where someone independent of the subject of the article has written and published non-trivial works that focus upon the subject. If you have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject, those should be provided first. Please feel free to provide here on the talk page any sources which meet the requirements above. When ready to proceed, please open a new edit request. Thank you! Regards, Spintendo  02:58, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If those arent available, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.
 * Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.