Talk:Anne Pigalle

not notable
This is clearly self-edited, and it is not a person of any note. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morbidactor (talk • contribs) 10:53, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * That's weird that you place the CSD warning to your own talk page, User talk:Morbidactor (And you welcome yourself??). Note that you should place it in the author's talk page, not yours. And also your account looks like it was created just to CSD this article. I doesn't mean that this CSD is invalid, but that add in into the suspicious list. Regards, NgYShung  huh? 11:16, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes - it's true I did just create the account - this was the edit that motivated me. I am new to this so I wasn't sure who the author in question was - would that be the person that made the first edit to the page?  I will do this.
 * I was reading about the "liggers" on the London scene this morning, we hosted an event last night and encountered some. I found this person mentioned as one of them, and even that she had a wikipedia page.  She's not known to me, but as part of that internet surfing, it just seemed off, after reading the article, that there was any article at all for the person - however she's not known to me, and was not in attendance at our event - so there's no specific personal motivation other than to clean up.
 * Some references:
 * https://maxjob13.wordpress.com/
 * https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/may/24/secret-world-of-liggers-free-booze
 * Morbidactor (talk) 11:30, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comments. Also when you tag an article for CSD, you should tag the CSD notification at the author's talk page. You should also use WP:TW to tag article for convenience. Btw, WP:WELCOME! Sincerely, NgYShung  huh? 11:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Re:Fraggle81
Sorry, didn't mean that edit to be vandalism. Nothing mean or malicious, actually trying to make it better for users. I had seen a tag at the top of pages before that said that they appear to be written by the article's subject. I have also seen a similar tag that says that there are not sources cited. I hoped that someone would replace my edit with one or both of those tags. I can't turn them up right now and I honestly don't care whether anyone else fixes it. As the page stands though, it seems more to defy wikipedia rules on self promotion than an edit pointing that out defies wikipedia rules on vandalism. -F 03:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Material removed
Removed this data from article: "" Des accents de chanteuse realiste a la Piaf" Paris Magazine- "un peu d'Edith, un peu de Marlene " Telerama"- "the kind of authenticity achieved by Tom Waits" Unique magazine-"chansons a la Lotte Lenya" City magazine- "femme fatale Pigalle, piafing it up in a manner guarenteed to make you feel like Joseph Cotton in the Third Man" Time Out Magazine - "the ghost of Jacques Brel returns to haunt you", "modern day Nico" Sounds Magazine - "I would like to be reincarnated as Anne Pigalle" Smash Hits- "Ronnie Scott's was an ideal venue to see Anne Pigalle, and the memory of her performance will linger" Music Week- "in a sea of ordinary women, men cannot help seeting out for femmes fatales" Tatler Magazine-"her songs cause a frisson" The Face Magazine - "her voice is so brilliant, it is like a butterfly, it touches the good and the bad, but never stays, keeps moving on..." Japanese magazine. Please re-format and give references for this before re-adding. This makes the article sound like a promo, rather than an encyclopeadia. Jenafalt (talk) 16:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

one of the worst articles on wikipedia
This must be one of the worst articles on wikipedia. It was obviously written by the subject of the article and is painful to read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.156.251.19 (talk) 03:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have cleaned it up a lot. -Lopifalko (talk) 10:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Conflict of interest, verifiable sources
The edits recently made demonstrate a conflict of interest as evidenced by edits such as this: "TO ANYONE who has taken the liberty to remove the genuine press reviews i have added from my press book, I suggest they should get directly in touch with me... Miss Pigalle...." Wikipedia is not a place for self-promotion. This should be done through another sort of website. Genuine press reviews should be referenced with sources. This means that the edits also have to be verifiable (see WP:SOURCE) - it can't be just that someone told his friends that you were good, as one of the recent edits mentioned. Please do not remove the fact tags without adding sources.

If you want to make a difference to an article about you, then look at the following links and make appropriate changes to the article: Also have a look around at other pages and see how they have been edited. If edits are made that do not fit the wikipedia encyclopedic style then I will continue to revert them. Please leave a message if you would like more help with any of this. Jenafalt (talk) 07:12, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... Anne Pigalle is a well known French singer and artist. Someone flagging the page for speedy deletion smacks at deliberate vandalism either against the named person or Wikipedia itself as a resource. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.29.164.1 (talk) 13:14, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Anne Pigalle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070613122510/http://www.annepigalle.com:80/ to http://www.annepigalle.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:35, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Citations still needed after 2 years...
Citations still needed for the WHOLE of this text block of biographical information; lots of claims there but absolutely zero evidence. Strong candidate for major text deletion but - despite a 2 year wait already since the last reference request- let's first see if any refs come forth after this latest request on 14 Nov 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finite Jest (talk • contribs) 22:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Also strong candidate for COI as there is a lot of unreferenced information that apparently could only have come from the subject as there are no third-parity sources given. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finite Jest (talk • contribs) 22:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

She is most definitely "notable" and worthy of a page here
But at the moment, sadly, said page is just a total trainwreck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.75.67 (talk) 03:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I have cleaned it up a lot. -Lopifalko (talk) 10:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC)