Talk:Anolis grahami

This article is not start class anymore. I believe it is a legitimate and substantial article. I took a look and added citations since some areas were poorly cited. There is a lot of solid information, so I simply changed around the headings and format. I do have one question however; do you think the Taxonomy section is too large and unnecessary? Might be worth cutting down if someone has the chance.Nikhil.sekar (talk) 23:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC) Nikhil.sekar

I really appreciated the information that was included. I added headings and subheadings to improve the readability of the piece. Pooja.neerumalla (talk) 23:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC) Pooja.neerumalla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poojaneerumalla (talk • contribs)

I suggest raising the rating of this article to "C-class". Lyttle-Wight (talk) 11:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)