Talk:Antaios

tell me why it is disputed? tell my why ?Aziri 12:19, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC) - it is to stupid to say the factuality of the article is disputed without any reason.

Let's see... It mentions "Berber" every couple of sentences; what evidence is there for the claim that this non-existent mythological person was Berber, other than the fact that a legend connects him with Tingis, and another legend connects Tingis with the city of that name, modern Tangier? What are your sources? Why is the Berber name of a character in ancient Greek mythology at all relevant - especially since there can be no evidence that that was his ancient Berber name, if he had one? - Mustafaa 09:27, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)

haha, i m not happy with your reasons, i have the source, but i won't help you to read theme, the writer was an historian and archeologist, there are also other source, but i find it too strange to say it is disputed just because you don't belive me or you don't like that or you don't know that. i can just say : hahahaha. Aziri 18:50, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * You could say that but it would not be very helpful to the purpose of writing an encyclopedia. If you have sources, please do present them. Rmhermen 03:34, Aug 4, 2004 (UTC)

but if you don't have sources to deny onething, pleas look for them before you say it is disputed without any helpful argument. furhter i don't time to give the source in this weather with this arguments. thus pleas don't claim anything just because you didn't get it on the school ! (aziri)

okke, i will give some names, but they are existant en non-disputed however you didn't get it on school : Diodorus Lucanus Apollodorus (old personages how wonderd the sepulchre of antaios) and this is the one gave the attention for its sepulchre : Plutarchus, and this is the one how visted his sepulchre (a berber archeologist and historian, further he is not disputed however you don't him and i will give nosource about him) :M.A'ashi. for details i have raly notime. goodlucky, and atleats i tell you : don't write that an article is dispited just because you don't know it. ... (aziri)

i didn't like give source, because i found that the disputy was not honest , it is easy to say that the factuality is diwputed just because you don't know that or because you cannot expalain that / 1+ http://www.minculture.gov.ma/arabe/ar_Medinas12.htm (ar.) : the name tanger is called to the wife of antaios " tnijis".

2+http://www.tamurth.net/article.php3?id_article=2 more informations ( the son of tinjis builded tanger and called it to hin mother "tindjis").

3+ the source : http://www.tawalt.com/archive.cfm?lg=_tz&mStartRow=76 : i got the informations of the firts areticle (that was disputed according to you ) from this article, the article is writen by an archeologist and historian who visted the sepulchre of antaios. (i don't think you can say anythinkg against that).

4+ http://www.theoi.com/Kronos/Antaios.html (just a link about the berber hero "antaios").

now, i would answer the wonders of mustafaa : why the moslims don't dispute the "Kaab" (the black Qibla of the moslims) : it is from the paradis (according to their islam and that paradis is not existant just in the brains of the moslim ) and further it is made by ibrahim and his son ismael if i remember good because allah spoked with them and said that they have to that. is that existant ? is that not on-existant ? and tell me why it is not disputed that heraclis killed antaios and that is not disputed however they are non-existanat ? . i don't need your answers, ik know them. (aziri).