Talk:Anthony Burns

Rocky Mount, VA vs. Rocky Mount, NC
Are we sure David McDaniel was from Rocky Mount, NC? I see a Charles F. Suttle buried in Rocky Mount, VA which is what made me question this. I'll do some more research and see if I can confirm or if an update is needed. -kim. (talk) 19:12, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Cost of Capture
Reference for cost of capture: http://www.masshist.org/longroad/01slavery/burns.htm Anthony burns was a great man. i am doing a report on him and i have realized how how horrible things where back then and i am happy they are different now.--96.27.150.124 (talk) 01:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Why he was hated
Because he caused demeostrations — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.64.13.117 (talk) 22:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anthony Burns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081108152931/http://eserver.org/thoreau/slavery.html to http://eserver.org/thoreau/slavery.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Footnotes need work
The 50 footnotes could be combined into about 10. Each page doesn't get a new entry. But I'm a little tired to use my time cleaning it up. Today. deisenbe (talk) 20:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I switched the footnotes to the sfn format. There's no need to continue to repeat the full citation for each page. I also consolidated the former Bibliography and the Further reading sections - and alphabetized the list.


 * I agree with reverting the edit that provided links for each page number. It adds a lot of unnecessary bulk to the article.


 * Regarding combining footnotes so that each page doesn't need its own footnote - My vote is Oppose. It would make it unnecessarily harder to find the right page in the source document.–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Anthony burns
J3jejrj 204.111.190.66 (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC)