Talk:Anthony Sullivan (pitchman)

Requested move 14 February 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Seems top be consensus that there is not a clear primary topic. (non-admin closure)  Turnagra (talk) 04:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC) – Per |Anthony_Sullivan_(rugby)|Anthony_Sullivan_(pitchman) pageviews and google search. 204.184.47.150 (talk) 14:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk&#124;contribs) 15:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Anthony Sullivan (pitchman) → Anthony Sullivan
 * Anthony Sullivan → Anthony Sullivan (disambiguation)
 * Support per nom -- The Tips  of   Apmh  15:31, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose, not convinced there's a PRIMARYTOPIC by long-term significance.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose. No primary topic for this minor article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Support The subject dominates in usage and page views and appears to meet our primary topic standards. That it is a "minor" article isn't relevant (although I'd say it's hard to say a subject that gets over a hundred views per day is minor by most standards), as we determine primary topic by comparing to others of the same name. A subject can be the most insignificant-seeming subject in the world and still be a primary topic.--Yaksar (let's chat) 06:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose. While neither of the sportspeople has a great deal of long-term significance, either is more significant than this media personality. The case for primary topic is very weak indeed. But I question whether (pitchman) is a suitable disambiguator. I had to look up what it means, and note that Pitchman has been redirected to both Hawker and Spokesperson (or Spokesman) at various times. I cannot find any other current use of this disambiguator and think it should be avoided. Andrewa (talk) 17:45, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose. No PTOPIC among these three people. I agree with Andrewa that the disambiguator (pitchman) is unclear if not unintelligible. Narky Blert (talk) 16:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)