Talk:Anti-Corruption Bureau (Maharashtra)

Requested move 13 January 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved to Anti-Corruption Bureau (Maharashtra) per Necrothesp's citation of WP policy'''  &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 21:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

– Maharashtra as in sources ; convert redirect Anti-Corruption Bureau to be a disambiguation as the target National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine is not referred to by "Anti-Corruption Bureau" in the sources ; move Argentina to be have consistent dab. — DaxServer (talk) 11:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Anti Corruption Bureau, Maharashtra → Anti-Corruption Bureau, Maharashtra
 * Anti-Corruption Bureau (Argentina) → Anti-Corruption Bureau, Argentina
 * Support per nom. There's no WP:PTOPIC for "Anti-Corruption Bureau." -- Ab207 (talk) 16:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Move to Anti-Corruption Bureau (Maharashtra). Parenthetical disambiguation by country is standard for organisations, so this is what would be consistent with other articles throughout Wikipedia. Support creation of dabpage. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * @Necrothesp Here Maharashtra is a state and not a country. Does it still apply for states? In that case the article Anti-Corruption Bureau, Andhra Pradesh shall also be moved to Anti-Corruption Bureau (Andhra Pradesh) — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 09:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Same thing in this case. Indeed it should. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)