Talk:Anti-Japan Tribalism

Infobox
I've expanded the box to split the difference between the two. However, I'm not sure it's beneficial to overspecify the publication date, and have omitted the second ISBN given that we have the 13-digit one available. Also, OCLC number should be included only when there is no ISBN. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:28, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
 * In general I agree that ISBN + OCLC is overkill. But in this case, since the book isn't found in either Google Books or Amazon, and since when you click on the OCLC it takes you directly to a Worldcat list of holdings, the OCLC helps to give evidence that this is a real book which is held in libraries. The second ISBN was invalid so it was good to drop that one. EdJohnston (talk) 19:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)