Talk:Anti-monarchism in Japan

Merge proposal
Anti-monarchism in Japan and Japanese dissidence during the early Shōwa period overlap greatly in scope both are small enough to be merged. Anti-monarchism in Japan seems to be the title which is more natural in modern English use, and is also more concise. I therefore recommend a merge into Anti-monarchism in Japan. Klbrain (talk) 22:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Japanese dissidence during the early Shōwa period though awkwardly titled, would have to be the article into which Anti-monarchism in Japan is merged, if they are to be merged at all. All content of Anti-monarchism in Japan could be placed in the Japanese dissidence during the early Shōwa period. The same cannot be said of the reverse. Anti-Monarchism is merely one of the varieties of dissent described in Japanese dissidence during the early Shōwa period. (73.159.76.118 (talk) 16:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC))
 * With this edit Kirwanfan removed a merge template without discussion, although this might have been inadertently done as part an article clean-up. As the discussion had support and no objections, I've returned the template to encourage further discussion. Klbrain (talk) 11:13, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Withdrawing proposal; I note that the historical period covered by the two articles is different. Klbrain (talk) 07:36, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Second-hand usage of the adjective antagonistic
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/antagonistic

http://archive.fo/w7oLx

Usually antagonistic requires an αγών/ἀγών/competition.

The word you used is correct but not the first option.

In political texs the statistical usage of words suggests notions and narratives.

The communists acted unilaterally in Japan simply because they're not important.

They want a President elected by the diet, but a single legal political party.

If they want many parties including non-communist then they're socialists, not commies.

For sure there's retarded though.

Karl Marx never created a new political system in his writings.

Vladimir Lenin was a practical communist of a specific period.

Communism isn't open to all opinions and to a free society.

It's a single party-monarchy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8406:1600:E422:4991:94C6:160E (talk) 09:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)