Talk:Anti-terrorism legislation

America
If no one has an objection i would like to start reviewing this article in its entirety for posterity and fact finding to bring it up to Wikipedia standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.29.239.50 (talk) 07:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Philippines
The Anti-terrorism law is effective July 15, 2007.

--Florentino floro 15:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

HAENIUOUS WAYFARER: ... [NEXUS COLLAPSES - the diamond protocol of corvonia underlines and tracks colombia - the point that is tachyon has this terrorist afghanistahn wedding - sackclothing a cocaine deal from the bahamas -] (DANGEROUS BAAL = civillian);	; FALSE TRADE ROUTE: 'jaen zero degrees ok' AFGANISTAHN CENTRUM 2 UKRAINE 3 PAKISTAHN 4 SRI LANKA 5 CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC;	; FALSE PROPHET:: 7 HOLOGRAMS I CORVONIA III EUROPE I USA II SOUTH AMERICAN BASTARD;	; CONSPIRACY: Invent totalitarian ethnic-cleansing-device before interest from russian federal labyrynth containing daedalus fairy queen of inheritance towards nomination of serial folding;	; ANTI TERRORIST UNIT IMMORTAL... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.164.249.128 (talk) 11:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Non-neutral point of view
"A good example of this is the "War on Terror" which officially was to end in 2003, however it persists to this day (Feb of 2011). With no clear end in sight it violates the laws of reason, facilitating its own brand of circular reasoning and a pseudo straw man ( "Terror" as the straw man). Perpetuating its own existence as it were. This presents an unusual case as a logical fallacy." This is the first time I've commented on Wikipedia; the above statement is far too biased to belong in any sort of encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.135.127 (talk) 00:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree that this appears to violate WP:NPOV; it also smells like WP:OR. --Lambiam 17:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm shocked that paragraph has survived on Wikipedia. The author did not substantiate any of his statements. His statements appear to be factually incorrect. Much of the paragraph appears to be merely his opinion. He appears to be using Wikipedia as a political platform to spread his views. I think it is damaging to unbiased, neutral information, the reader and Wikipedia to leave that section intact. Pooua (talk) 18:29, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old POV template with a dormant discussion, per the instructions on that template's page:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

If editors are continuing to work toward resolution of any issue and I missed it, however, please feel free to restore. Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:09, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anti-terrorism legislation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070808061330/http://www.univ-paris13.fr/CRIDAF/DOCTORANTS/BANTMAN-Constance.htm to http://www.univ-paris13.fr/CRIDAF/DOCTORANTS/BANTMAN-Constance.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080127132341/http://www.oic-un.org/26icfm/c.html to http://www.oic-un.org/26icfm/c.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091111085043/http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/pdf/090723-LS-in-pursuit-justice-09-update.pdf to http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/pdf/090723-LS-in-pursuit-justice-09-update.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:27, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

The Netherlands
Suggested editional paragraph

3.8 The Netherlands

The Netherlands has passed multiple anti-terrorism laws, and are currently in the process of criminalising the residence in an area controlled by a terrorist organisation. This would advance the possibilities to prosecute returning foreign fighters, but moves prosecution further into the pre-crime space. [1]

(ICCT.nl (talk) 11:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC))