Talk:AntiPatterns

This Article is Worthless
I followed a link from Anti-pattern to AntiPatterns. I must say this article is nonsensical, poorly edited, and seems to lack purpose or relevance. Miqrogroove (talk) 02:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure you understand the context of this article is to describe the book titled 'Antipatterns', not to describe the subject of anti-patterns themselves which already exists as you state. It does assume a little knowledge of the subject at hand, but it is hardly nonsensical. It is coherent and has a decent if brief structure, so I don't think editing is an issue. Its purpose and relevance should be clear in that it is the origin of the concepts outlined in the aforementioned article. If you could provide more insight on how this article could be improved I would be happy to add detail. Nazlfrag (talk) 10:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Many of the review links are broken. One of them just dumps you on the reviews.com front page. I'm not aware of protocol on how to best handle this, but if anyone is reading, this is clearly something that needs fixing. (February 2015) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:9:100:832:B8EA:A4D:3373:A15C (talk) 22:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on AntiPatterns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080706200430/http://www.ddj.com/joltawards/prev_bks.htm to http://www.ddj.com/joltawards/prev_bks.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC)