Talk:Antique tool

POV
There is significantly worthy content here, but much of it is wrapped up in non-NPOV. Also, contains much first-person perspective ("I have never seen the reasoning behind collecting...", "I'm sure the answer...", etc. AbsolutDan 22:14, 10 March 2006 (UTC) Guess the content was too good. Good catch, Luigizanasi AbsolutDan 22:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Google is your friend. :-) Although User:Tooltimer might be the owner of one of the web sites stuff was copied from. I left a note on his user page. Luigizanasi 22:48, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreeing about the value of the content and about its being too personal, I have done a preliminary edit. George K (26.5.06)

Copyright infringement
There is no copyright infringmeent here, as I am the original author of both the Antique Tools page in wikipedia and the sites where I have the original material. PLease restore the page. I'm not a Wiki expert and don't know all the places I have to go to to make this happen. -Unknown

Article move
I moved the article from Antique Tools to Antique tools. Hopefully no one objects, there's no reason to capitalize 'tools'. Tyciol 16:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

cruft snipped
Snipped the pointless:

Search engines can be utilized to locate sites like this for whatever class of tools one may be interested in.

It is necessary to learn the differences between various tools, their history and the history of their makers. 86.29.7.158 (talk) 10:15, 26 July 2015 (UTC)