Talk:Antisemitism in the British Labour Party

Incorrect quote from Antony Lerman in section "Working definition of antisemitism"
I noticed that the sentence "The fundamental principle that IHRA is so flawed it should be abandoned, not tinkered with." doesn't make sense so I took a look at the two references cited. Neither reference contains precisely this text and the same is true for the previous sentence, namely "Jewish leaders claim exclusive rights to determine what is antisemitism, potentially putting Jewish sentiment above the law of the land". Regarding the first sentence I have mentioned, source " Lerman 2018b" contains: "Now is an opportunity to establish the fundamental principle that IHRA is so flawed it should be abandoned, not tinkered with." That sentence makes sense, unlike the one in the Wikipedia article. Misha Wolf (talk) 15:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Go ahead and change the ref. I'm not sure this is due in that section tbh. BobFromBrockley (talk) 15:10, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Have trimmed now. See above talk section. BobFromBrockley (talk) 16:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Rochdale by-election, Labour withdrawing support for candidate Azhar Ali due to antisemitic conspiracy theory.
Labour had to withdraw support for a candidate Azhar Ali in the 2024 Rochdale by-election earlier tonight due to he allegedly said in a Labour Party meeting that Israel had "allowed" the deadly attack by Hamas on 7th October. Pikachu3408 (talk) 21:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. GrayStorm(Talk&#124;Contributions) 22:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Reversal of Arbitration
I would like to table a motion to revive this article from its Arbitration. It is inconsistent with another article on the same topic. The "Jeremy Corbyn" page includes reference to the same subject in a far more elaborate form that makes this article look incomplete and misleading. It is a bad look for Wikipedia to have varying stances on the same topic and I think a more methodical, structured approach is needed so as to avoid confusion and disparity. LairdCamelot (talk) 22:14, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Authors Letter (2017)
This paragraph fails to indicate what relevance the author's letter to the Times newspaper has to the Labour Party (which is the subject of the wiki page). It needs either amending to make that link, or removal. 2A02:C7E:2F64:6B00:B070:3F30:D94D:DD2F (talk) 14:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)