Talk:Antoinism/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.'' Reviewer: The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 17:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Tentative review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Nominator's replies:
 * 1A: Spelling and grammar probably need to be checked, as I added some content, and my English is not very good...
 * 1B: I removed all the "cult" mentions and replaced them by "services" or "worship". I also extended the lead section per WP:LEAD.
 * 2C: The book does not say that Antoinism is frequently described with neutral words in books about cults. I must admit that this wording was only my feeling when I added this sentence in the article. So yes, I agree this needed to be reworded to avoid an original research. I added the following phrase, which is probably more factual: "Books published by Belgian and French anti-cult organizations and activists sometimes included Antoinism in their lists of cults, such as [I cite two books here]".
 * 3A: The most extensive study of the history of Antoinism is Dericquebourg's 1993 book Les Antoinistes. I checked the pages which cover the last 70 years (only five pages), and the author says: "La suite de l'histoire de l'antoinisme belge est relativement calme" (p. 25), then "En France, l'histoire du mouvement fut plus calme" (p. 26). The only details provided on this period is the differences between the French and the Belgian temples. As I understand, there was no "key figure" (I don't know if I use the good word...) in Antoinism after Catherine Antoine's death and the direction of the movement has been anonymous until today. So I can't expand more the "1940-present: Continuity of the worship" section, as it appears to me that there is nothing special to add...
 * 3B: I drastically reduced the size of the table of locations and times of worship and removed/merged superfluous details, but I kept it, as these differences seem to be one of the major changes between French and Belgian branches. I hope this is no longer overly focused now.

Your comments are welcomed, and I remain ready to fix any potential issues, as far as I can resolve them. Regards, --Europe22 (talk) 18:54, 10 June 2011 (UTC)


 * PS: Antoinist or antoinist when the word is used as adjective ? --Europe22 (talk) 19:16, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Antoinist I do believe The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 21:07, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Final Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail: