Talk:Antonin Raymond/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 09:36, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments:
 * "After the war, Raymond's practice with Tuttle, Seelye and Place dissolved and he went into business with another Czech architect, Ladislav Leland Rado (1909-1993), Raymond & L. L. Rado" - The last two parts are a bit confusing. Did they set up two companies? It needs a bit more clarity.

I have helped copy edit the article, mainly for punctuation issues and MoS compliance. The only thing left is the clarification for the sentence above. I will place this On Hold in the meantime.


 * Thanks for your time reviewing this article. I have amended the problem sentence and I hope this helps to clarify things! Kenchikuben (talk) 19:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the clarification. I am now satisfied that the article meets all the criteria for a Good Article, and I am happy to pass it. Well done! -- S Masters (talk) 04:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)