Talk:Antonio Luna/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: KevinNinja (talk · contribs) 23:15, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Let's start!

Lead

 * Lead should be broken up into multiple paragraphs or reformatted to improve readability.
 * "He was regarded as the most brilliant of the Filipino military officers during the war" includes a word to watch. I would recommend reformatting or removing this line, or including more sources.

Family background

 * I believe that this section could be broken up, if possible, to improve readability.

Final review checklist

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Well written. Minor grammar fixes could be done, but nothing major. Please continue to maintain this article.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Sourcing is well done. Much improved.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Detailed, but some structural improvements are possible.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Pictures could go into more detail.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Well done; good article. Small improvements could be made, mostly in format and small detailing.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Well done; good article. Small improvements could be made, mostly in format and small detailing.