Talk:Antonio Mancini

is this vandalism?
is this vandalism? comment about the painter being a sex pervert, referencing his "son" as well. im taking it out, but i want to note it appears to be deliberate. of course, if its true, it needs to be referenced. is this the right way to do this? there is a nico mancini whose website hints at him being a roleplayer. this may be part of an elaborate online game of intrigue, or slander addressed at this person. im all for gameplaying, but not when it uses the commons in this manner. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Antonio Mancini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051027074203/http://www.mattiajona.com:80/schede/mancinipastel.html to http://www.mattiajona.com/schede/mancinipastel.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050827014727/http://www.phryne.com:80/artists/34-12-92.HTM to http://www.phryne.com/artists/34-12-92.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:24, 16 October 2016 (UTC)