Talk:Antonio Paoli/GA1

GA Review

 * The following is an archived discussion of a good article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:good article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by Pyrotec 10:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC).

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 09:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 09:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Intial comments

 * This certainly looks like a Good Article, so it will pass (in due course); however, I noticed a fair number of direct quotations, e.g "this is a quotation", most of which are uncited. This needs to be addressed before gaining GA-status.


 * I will now start my detailed review, but as usual I'm leaving the WP:Lead unitl last. I will mostly be commenting on problems, so if I don't comment on a section here it means that I consider it to be OK. Pyrotec (talk) 15:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Early years -
 * His family -
 * The first paragraph as a whole is a direct quotation from ref 2, but it is not marked as such.
 * The second paragraph as a whole is a direct quotation from ref 2, but it is not marked as such.


 * His home: Casa Paoli -
 * This as a whole is a direct quotation from ref 2, but it is not marked as such.


 * Review On Hold. Pyrotec (talk) 16:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments on revised version

 * I note that the "problems" due to block-copying from Juan Llanes Santos (August 11, 2009) have been resolved.


 * Citations
 * The article is generally well-referenced, but there are a few paragraphs that are under-referenced; but that is probably a consequence of the following:
 * This article is heavily reliant on the US Department of the Interior, National Parks Service, National Register of Historic Places Registration Form, prepared by Juan Llanes Santos, which is a comprehensive source of information.
 * As such, this article might (incorrectly) regarded as being a One source article.
 * The National Register of Historic Places Registration Form, Section 9, has a Bibliography which contains mostly primary sources, however, it does contain two secondary sources.
 * I would recommend that these two secondary sources are investigated, as they could provide additional information which could improve this article.
 * I've also looked in Credo, but can't find any information.

Pyrotec (talk) 10:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 10:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)