Talk:Antony Crowther

was a designer
Was? Why was? Did he die or retire or something? Kikimm (talk) 05:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * He's just a plain programmer now. He's no longer designing software but only coding what a software designer gives him. -- Lyverbe (talk) 18:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Dead links
Last week, I made the effort of removing all the dead links. They are now back. It would be nice if the person who put them back would do the work of taking them out. Lyverbe 17:02, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Er, that was me :P ... Are they really considered "dead" links, rather than links to "articles-that-haven't-been-written-yet"? Is this un-Wiki? &mdash;Metamorf 13:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Oops, I checked the Wiki MoS, and yea verily, 'tis is a wrist-slappable offence... Red links are gone now. &mdash;Metamorf 14:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thx :) Lyverbe 16:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Burnout 5
I was told that he has been helping out on Burnout 5. If somebody can get the list of programmers who worked on this title, please try to find if Tony is listed in there. If so, we'll add "Burnout 5" to his softography. Lyverbe 12:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:William Wobbler.gif
The image Image:William Wobbler.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --05:07, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * "Non-free use rationale" template has been added to the screenshot. -- Lyverbe (talk) 12:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Potty Pigeon
This page needs a seperate section on Potty Pigeon - after all this was one of the defining games of the 1980s and inspired much good. Crowther was a legend and it is a crying shame that the much needed Potty Pigeon chapter remains to be written. I learned this song on the piano only because of this game and I won a competition with it when I was 11. Thanks Tony. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.244.29.195 (talk) 12:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The fact that you personally like the game doesn't mean it deserves its own section. To be honest with you, I've never heard of it. -- Lyverbe (talk) 23:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Um... when they say "citation needed" - generally it doesnt refer to whether or not his highness Lyverbe has "heard of it" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.244.29.195 (talk) 09:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)