Talk:Any Human Heart/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: -- Cirt (talk) 19:05, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I will review this article. -- Cirt (talk) 19:05, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of November 5, 2010, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Writing is pretty good throughout. I would suggest contacting WP:GOCE and going for WP:PR after this point, and requesting further copyediting, with an eye for a bit more succinct wording.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout. One of the cites contains a redlink. A few others could use more info and fields filled in.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: It is indeed thorough, covers major aspects, including: Composition, Synopsis, Themes, Genre and style, and Critical reception''.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Neutral presentation throughout, no issues here.
 * 5. Article stability? Appears stable from inspection of article edit history and talk page history.
 * 6. Images?: One image used, appropriate fair use rationale on image page, passes here.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — -- Cirt (talk) 22:04, 5 November 2010 (UTC)