Talk:Anything Box

Untitled
Do we really need like 3 separate discographies / discography sections? And telling people where to buy things makes Wikipedia an advertisement. Yeesh. --76.121.154.233 (talk) 20:32, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anything Box. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100422221703/http://www.anythingbox.com/anythingbox-epk.html to http://www.anythingbox.com/anythingbox-epk.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:28, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

"one of the primary bands which carried electronic music's transition from the late 1980s into the 1990s and beyond"
This strikes me as patently unsupportable.

This sentence was added with in August 2007, one of a large number of anonymous edits from 129.46.66.107 (whose history consists solely of edits to this article, plus two other articles related to Anything Box). Perhaps it's just a coincidence, but this IP is located in San Diego, very close to where the band is currently based.

The original text was: "Known primarily for their 1990 hit Living in Oblivion, they also garnered some attention for releasing an album entirely in MP3 format in 2003."

The modified text (which remains to this day) was: "The band is one of primary bands which carried electronic music's transition from the late 1980's into the 1990's and beyond."

In one edit, we went from "one-hit wonder" to "primary band of their genre and era", with no citations to back it up.

I'm strongly inclined to restore the original language here, or something like it. Thoughts?

Greenie2600 (talk) 23:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)