Talk:Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.elections.org.nz/news/mt-albert-by-election-preliminary-results.html
 * Added tag to http://www.elections.org.nz/news/mana-by-election-official-results.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720213322/http://www.elections.org.nz/study/news/te-tai-tokerau-by-election-preliminary-results.html to http://www.elections.org.nz/study/news/te-tai-tokerau-by-election-preliminary-results.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130703060107/http://www.electionresults.govt.nz:80/2013_ikaroa_rawhiti_byelection/electorate-65.html to http://www.electionresults.govt.nz/2013_ikaroa_rawhiti_byelection/electorate-65.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:32, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Rewrite of electoral results section
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just done a substantial rewrite of the section of the electoral results section. My changes include:


 * Removing lists of all candidates and vote numbers of other parties in each election. This level of detail is available in the articles on those elections and isn't relevant to the ALCP article. In their place I have highlighted particularly interesting results, including collating the last three general election results to find the best electoral candidate result.
 * Removing information better summarised by the tables.
 * Made separate sections for general election results and by-election results.
 * Removed or marked subjective statements such as "high-profile candidates" or "almost doubled" when results only were 1.6 times the previous figure

If I have been overzealous in removing relevant information, please do add it back in. I think the new structure is better though that's a different question as to what information goes in that structure.

Thanks for looking over this, HenryCrun15 (talk) 14:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)