Talk:ApertusVR

This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedily deleted because this version was the original article, which describes ApertusVR the best. This is my first Wikipedia article and I wanted to put more internal links, but the article was edited as: "Speedy deletion declined. Criterion A1 does not apply: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article"

I don't agree with it because: - the features paragraph described well ApertusVR's features, while the first three lines don't. - the architecture paragraph described more details about ApertusVR architecture, while the first three lines don't. - the application paragraph described the application of ApertusVR, while the first three lines do not at all.

I understand, that I have to insert links to internal Wikipedia pages, but why did you / others mark the article for deletion? I think it's not reasonable. As you can see A-Frame Wiki page, there is also History, Benefits, Usage paragraphs... Why did you say that our "Application" paragraph is not equivalent to A-Frame's "Benefits" paragraph?

Thanks & Regards,

Akos Hamori