Talk:Apocalypse: The Twelve

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

Page moved --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 12:45, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

X-Men: The Twelve → Apocalypse: The Twelve — Proper name of the content of the article. — Rau  J16  17:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

It should be changed to "Apocalypse: The Twelve". That was the title of the crossover. DCincarnate (talk) 12:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Agreed, i am going to request it now. (there is an article with that name that is a redirect)  Rau  J16  17:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete
Why's this up for deletion? :S Steveking 89 (talk) 23:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Because it cites no references and contains only plot related information. It does not even mention anything outside of the comics universe. It fails to prove its notability. It just an overall bad article. If you can provide an argument against its deletion, and these claims, contest the deletion. I encourage it. A lot of work went into this article. Rau's talk 23:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Improvement
I hate to see the deletion of useful material from Wikipedia, so I did my best to keep this from getting deleted. Unfortunately for the article, I don't know anything about the subject, so I'm going to be of limited use in improving this. Most of the ghits are all in-universe information, and thus far, I haven't been able to find any kind of review materials or the like.

I did find some links to pricing however. Maybe we can find data on sales, pricing and the like, and use that to establish notability and something other than just plot information. Celarnor (talk) 20:13, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Uncanny377.jpg
The image Image:Uncanny377.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --01:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)