Talk:Apollo 16/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grondemar (talk · contribs) 01:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

This is an excellent article, very close to GA status. I have just a couple of minor concerns that need to be addressed before I pass the review:


 * Apolune and Perilune: According to Apsis, the forms Apocynthion and Pericynthion were preferred during the Apollo program. Perhaps we should use those instead?


 * In the Lunar Surface section, a direct quote from geologist Don Wilhelms needs an immediate citation.


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This review is being placed on hold for a minimum of seven days to allow the above concerns to be addressed.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This review is being placed on hold for a minimum of seven days to allow the above concerns to be addressed.
 * This review is being placed on hold for a minimum of seven days to allow the above concerns to be addressed.

Thanks. –Grondemar 06:49, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I've addressed both of your concerns. Thanks very much for your review. Tyrol5   [Talk]  14:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for addressing my concerns; I can now pass this good article nomination.  Congratulations! –Grondemar 21:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)