Talk:Apollo 18 (album)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments very good, a few minor style comments really. Otherwise this is a decent article. I'll put it on hold for seven days. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:07, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Can we avoid the use of the hash to represent "number" per MOS:HASH please?
 * "managed to chart" -> "charted".
 * "This disagreement caused a rift between Elektra and the band that took a while to heal." is this really relevant? I'm not sure about the encyclopedic tone of "took a while to heal" either.
 * "during a span of about nine to ten weeks" why not just simplify to "in approximately ten weeks"?
 * "used "old standbys"." quote needs ref.
 * Link "fuzz-box" if possible.
 * Unlink common terms, e.g. encyclopedia.
 * Can you adjust the fair use rationale for the ISY logo so it points at the album article rather than the disambiguation page for Apollo 18?
 * Don't overlink International Space Year, and since you abbreviated it, I'd use the abbreviation the next time round.
 * " A User's Guide to They Might Be Giants: Melody, Fidelity, Quantity would take its subtitle from." -> "from which A User's Guide to They Might Be Giants: Melody, Fidelity, Quantity would take its subtitle."
 * Allmusic -> AllMusic.
 * Album table is sortable with a single entry, no point, especially since the singles table is not sortable.
 * Thank for reviewing this article. I believe I've changed and/or fixed the issues. How does this look?-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   16:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your timely response and your efforts. A good article indeed, so I'm happy to promote. Good work.  The Rambling Man (talk) 20:09, 5 July 2015 (UTC)