Talk:Apple ISO 9660 Extensions

Is a comparison with FAT really relevant? As I understand, FAT is only used nowadays in portable media devices (MP3/4 players, cameras, etc). NTFS on the other hand, can store metadata, alternate streams, extra properties, previous versions, etc.

Neither FAT, HFS or NTFS are directly used as CD formats, so such comparisons are irrelevant - surely this article should be describing the purpose, design and usage of these extensions? 93.97.30.204 (talk) 12:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)