Talk:Apple v. Does

Difference between "John Doe" suit and lawsuit against Think Secret
Although these lawsuits are separate they are very much related and in my opinion we should keep them both in this article, at least for now. We just need to be clear about the difference. Also we may need to change the title of the page as "Apple v. Does" refers specifically to Apple's case against ThinkSecret, Appleinsider and PowerPage in regard to Asteroid (the codename for an as-yet-unreleased firewire audio interface product). —Christiaan 13:07, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I've moved the section on the anti-slapp motion to the correction section - it was mixed up with the Apple Vs Does case. I'd recommend totally seperating Apple Vs dePlume and Apple Vs Does, and I'll try to do this later on. Ianbetteridge 15:58, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

NPOV?
"All parties concerned have publicly told Apple to go forth and multiply."

Does not seem very neutral to me. 199.244.214.30 18:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Apple v. Does latest info.
I don't really have the time to do this, but Ars just did a nice report of the Apple v. Does lawsuit and the latest decision that was handed down. If someone could incorporate it into the article it would be very helpful. Also, adding a nice summary with the updated information here would be a good addition as well. Paul C/T+ 06:36, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
I think it would be beneficial to define some legal terms to make it easier to comprehend. Nicole.young1 (talk) 05:27, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 one external links on Apple v. Does. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://75.102.3.20/old/content/2006/05/6933.ars
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thinksecret.com/filings/antislappmemorandum.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thinksecret.com/news/antislapp.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.drunkenblog.com/drunkenblog-archives/000473.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.drunkenblog.com/drunkenblog-archives/000374.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://blog.ziffdavis.com/rothenberg/archive/2005/03/06/6137.aspx
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/11110787.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050319020745/http://www.businessweek.com:80/technology/content/mar2005/tc20050317_3647_tc120.htm to http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2005/tc20050317_3647_tc120.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC)