Talk:Approved screening device

Merger with Approved instrument
I am generally against the merging of approved screening device and approved instrument. Both are very different types of devices, used in very different ways, with different laws (both in the Criminal Code and in the case law), and used as evidence in different ways. As long as there is a seperate article on one, there should be a seperate article on both.

That being said, it may be possible to merge these articles with Drunk driving (Canada), but only if editors can make sure that that article does not become too large (as it already is a highly technical article). Singularity42 (talk) 13:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Article needs more world centric material
The article title purports to refer to a type of device used almost globally to test driver's breath for alcohol. Yet the article revolves entirely around Canada. It needs material that gives a perspective from the many other countries that employ these devices. 86.145.244.180 (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Is there anything to suggest that this is a term used outside of Canada? Singularity42 (talk) 19:57, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * It has been over a week with no response. I still can't find anything to suggest this is a term outside of Canada.  I am therefore removing the globalize tag. Singularity42 (talk) 10:42, 13 May 2013 (UTC)